Shengren – Chapter – Friedrich W. C. K. F. F. v. Humboldt

Friedrich Wilhelm Christian Karl Ferdinand Freiherr von Humboldt, or Friedrich W. C. K. F. F. von Humboldt, or just ‘Humboldt,’ has been called a many names: diplomat, educator, the educator, reformer, orientalist, philosopher, and a passionate linguistic. He was also a great sponsor of German orientalism. Humboldt lent his name to the Humboldt’sche University Reformation, an educational reform that thoroughly changed first German education and then the European and American ones.

German children’s moral education started at the age of three in the Kindergarten. By the age of six the pupils entered the school system and during the next four years they were examined by their ability to think logically, rationally and scientifically. Meanwhile, their moral education continued along Christian values. At the age of ten, their future would be decided: the children were divided onto three school forms, according the function they were supposed to take up in German society later in life: the Hauptschule produced Germany’s low-skill workers, the Realschule produced Germany’s office personnel and service people, and the Gymnasium educated the future German intelligentsia. The latter alone prepared for university entry, and thus lasted two or three years longer. In German language, the word ‘Student’ is reserved for University students only. All other leaners are called ‘Schüler’ (pupils). After finishing worker or service school, the young have to go into apprenticeship and parallel attend vocational schools for two to four years. Their ‘formation’ is finalized by a vocational certificate. You see from this long process that every person only gets one certificated ‘career’. Whatever occupation the Germans were trained in (or studied for) – that one became their lifelong do. And because it took a third of one’s life-time to eventually get there, a sudden career shift or change of profession was absurd and outright unthinkable. From today’s perspective, this sound very inflexible, so why did people comply? The responsibility for education lied primarily with the state and the federated Länder, not with the parents, and thus all education was for free in turn for the parents’ handing over the future of their children to the nation.

Once the loyal and selected few entered a German university, they enjoyed academic freedom and few restrictions to what they could do and what they wanted to learn, even how long it took them. Such academic freedom resulted into the greatest possible creativity. But is also resulted into academic humbug, bogus science (idealismus), and all sorts of cults and prejudices: fanatic religiousness, institutionalized racism, political arrangement, and pitiless orientalism.

Germany never differentiated between the sciences and the humanities: both were Wissenschaften (sciences). The humanities were called Geisteswissenschaften (the sciences of the mind); and law was called Rechtswissenschaften (the sciences of law). Even music was called a science in Germany: Musikwissenschaft (the science of music). Better than that: The Humboldt’sche University Reform meant also that the study of other cultures, literature, and languages, became sciences too. For example the study of Islam became Islamwissenschaften (the sciences of Islam). Sometimes the qualifier ‘Wissenschaft’ (science) is omitted in favor of expert terminology. Regardless, Indology, Sinology, Japanology, Buddhology are all parts of the Kulturwissenschaften (the sciences of culture, or the cultural sciences) and Geschichtswissenschaften (the sciences of history), or Sprachwissenschaften (the sciences of languages).

In addition, the Humboldt reform made the study of Greek and/or Latin grammar compulsory. Most doctoral degrees demanded Latin proficiency (by proof of school ‘certificate’), including philosophy and medicine. The study of foreign languages generally became very popular, and for a strategic goal: Humboldt’s plan for the scientification of all branches of human knowledge entailed that foreign cultures and languages should be studied in the same way Germany studied the natural sciences. Mastering the natural sciences was to control nature. Mastering the mind sciences was to control mind. Mastering foreign cultures was to control those cultures. Common sense has it that studying a foreign language such as Italian was best done by spending four years in Italy. But that is not was a university education was all about. A university education is scientific writing, textual analysis, etymology, literature, comparison studies. The study of Classical and foreign languages in Germany had to be done in Germany, from the German perspective, through the German medium. Likewise, Chinese had to be learned in Germany, not in China. (Which is true even today, and few question this for political reason.) Not to mention the influence of Christian moral education and the philosophical approach to all German thinking. An irritating side effect of the Humboldt’sche reform – to the anger and envy of the other Europeans – was that German thinkers now felt the urge to explain to foreigners how those foreigners think or how they ought to think, and would not tolerate foreign opinions. What were mere foreign opinions against German superior universities and their infallible cultural sciences?

The Germans, arrogantly did not need to go and see and hold a conversation, they had abiding confidence in text criticism and reasoning and faith in their brutality.[1]

The coming of the cultural Nazi was only a matter of when. Nazism is the total rationalization of one’s ego. Total rationalization is spiritual. That’s why the people inside Germany thought they were acting completely rational (even practical), while the outside world watched in horror a gigantic German cult eating away at reason.

[1] Marchand, 2009, p. 497

Pattberg, Thorsten (2011), Shengren – Above Philosophy and Beyond Religion, LoD Press, New York

Have a Look at the Latest Posts:


Katie Hopkins RACE-BAIT FAIL in Africa

February 9, 2018

THERE IS NO RACISM IN AFRICA: REPORTING ABOUT IT IS RACISM Lauren Southern did it, so why not Katie Hopkins? It’s huge click-bait and the gossip jackpot: I’m going to investigate the murders of white […]